Ali Malik's blog

Inter-religious dialogue has become a buzzword these days. After the controversy followed by the controversial remarks of Pope, the Church has adopted the line of an inter-faith dialogue. Not only that, it has also become a hip thing amongst the liberals and peace-quacks. And though I have a very high regard for their statesmanship and scholarship, even President Clinton and Prime Minister Blair have joined in the chorus. But just when everyone talks about the dialogue between the religions and faiths, no one is coming up with the parameters for such dialogue. All they vaguely suggest is a need for debate on role of rationality in faith. Sounds illuminating, but is it practical? I mean, how can you convince a Muslim to accept the rationale of trinity or how can you expect a Christian to accept that Islam is a true religion of the God of Jesus and Moses and it is here that the God completed his religion (both things fundamental to the respective beliefs of Islam and Christianity). Or ho...

Inter-religious dialogue has become a buzzword these days. After the controversy followed by the controversial remarks of Pope, the Church has adopted the line of an inter-faith dialogue. Not only that, it has also become a hip thing amongst the liberals and peace-quacks. And though I have a very high regard for their statesmanship and scholarship, even President Clinton and Prime Minister Blair have joined in the chorus. But just when everyone talks about the dialogue between the religions and faiths, no one is coming up with the parameters for such dialogue. All they vaguely suggest is a need for debate on role of rationality in faith. Sounds illuminating, but is it practical? I mean, how can you convince a Muslim to accept the rationale of trinity or how can you expect a Christian to accept that Islam is a true religion of the God of Jesus and Moses and it is here that the God completed his religion (both things fundamental to the respective beliefs of Islam and Christianity). Or ho...

Whether it comprises true-lies or false-truths? Whether Mahmood wanted to corner Musharaf and take power or Armitage is lieing? Whether Kargil was a success turned to failure by Nawaz or a loss covered up? These are the questions for the history to answer and trust me, history will. "In the line of fire" is out to narrate tyrants version of history and his grasped the media attention and that of public too. I congratulate Mushahid Hussain for writing a potential best-seller.

thou smile was shine to date it brings pine when party was on and your eyes were on mine your hair were straightened and lips were as wine and there i made the mistake of thinking you as mine (A tribute to the spirit and soul of Splendid Splendor)

In the recent times the inaction and lack of direction on part of PPP was a major disappointment for me and people of Pakistan. However, not breaking away from its usual lack of direction the political front, PPP has taken a principled stand on Women Protection Bill and the strategy so far seems perfect. A lot of people will call such thing s sell-out but it should not stop party from standing for the right cause. PPP has long been a supporter of amendments to injust Hadood Laws and the bill approved by Select Committee, though short of party demands, provided relief to women and was a step in the right direction. For this reason, PPP supported it unconditionally despite the continuous victimization of party workers and leaders. In standing for a principled position, either of the two outcomes is a Win-Win for party. If the legislation goes through as per Select Committee recommendations, PPP and women of Pakistan have won a major battle in the long fight for justice and if the Govt. y...